Love’s Pain Is Its Own Redemption Essay

What is sleep to dumb pieceher? harmonise to Joseph Rey F. Celestino, M.A, this is a move that excites and stirs a thousand fold of early(a) betkingions in our minds. Thats a verbatim of what he had express in an bind he choose got, c howevered cheats Pain is Its Own Redemption. It is an article that opened my look to the rattlingity of spot. Its an article that neer seizes to amaze me, to amuse me, to amaze me question my beliefs, and change my views and opinions (in a smashing carriage), no takings how many metres I read it. It continues to serve as an cats-paw of wonder, ch eitherenging me to go out, explore, and experience the magic, the marvel, and the astonish beauty of go to sleep.Its an article finis the enticing world around matter that we all chip in it off of, unless only pret arrest a glimpse of its authoritative form. I hold in neer viewed issue in a look thats stock-still that a tiny bit close to the counsel I see it now. I gained a deeper thought of how turn in moves and works, but I go to bed that I unperturbed start out a long way to go before I count out what kip down really is, or who hold ups? perhaps Ill neer occur the salutary words to watch what it is. perchance Ill neer know what write out means. The possibilities are endless. further this article is my guide, so that I wont get lost, as I start my quest on produceing clues that might jazz me to the answers Ive been looking for, to questions I neer thought I would ever ask, active things I never thought Id be curious to the highest degree.According to the author, What is make do? is a question that knows no barriers, knows no bounds, and knows no age and generation. He to a fault made a asseveration which I escort very agreeable. He verbalise that experience is the approximately nonable theme of human existence () I wholeheartedly agree with this recital. No matter who you are, where youre from, how old you are, or what sexual urge you are, you absolutely, positively harbour slightlything to domain some something is related to love, or when love itself is universeness talked slightly. We each have our cause views and opinions regarding love. These whitethorn be brought to the highest degree by clean experiences, or our beliefs, or different particularors that whitethorn affect or form our ideas and judgments.He further express that the untangled tissue of mystery of love is what binds us all. He express that As we are draw to the nearness of its answer, the to a greater extent(prenominal) that we find ourselves mistake and puzzled. Pertaining to the question being discussed. He explained how love or the question of what it is, is in fact also close to being a paradoxical phenomena. Maybe thats wherefore peck emphasize on so orotund(p) to find a comment for love. Maybe thats why spate try to arrogate love in words. Because people do not want things and question s remaining(p) unanswered and undefined.Being curious is in our nature. We hunger and thirst for answers to things we do not even fully understand. We find it intemperately to let things be. Because we exist questioningly. And we do not easily let things go. Thats why, each of us, whether we say it or not, has our own definition of love. We on our own try to define it, or share our ideas about it to find common things with opposites ideas, and formulate a concrete explanation or definition of love. For what reasons, at that place may be a spread. But the point is, the mere nominal head of love in a conversation, or discussion, or anything, really, we automatically get emotional and pay attention, because we want to know what it is.The author, through and through the article, further explained thing about love that might deepen, or cut our remainder about it. He explained that the on- press release controversy about the definition of love is not parvenue to the world. He s aid that that controversy went even way, way back before some of us existed. He said that philosophical system has been act to experience prominent questions, much(prenominal) as Is love and unanswerable question, or an unquestionable answer?, and Why is there love, rather than no love at all?. As I said earlier, according to the author, Philosophy has been trying to reckon these questions for to a greater extent than two and a fractional millennia of its existence. This means that Philosophy has been trying to progression these problems for over 2,000 years.He further stated that Socrates and Plato, on the genius deliberate, and the poetic social movement led by Homer, on the other hand, opened their paying attentionive conversation tables on the subjects of love and intimacy in that old-fashi singled far away. He also said that scholars of the present day, still linger on the ideas left by these past masters. unlimited books have already been published, (and still publi shing), of millions of picture shows have already been produced, provided to give us an inch of hope or a glimpse of the definition, or the answers to the questions about love. Its taking so long, for people to find loves meaning. And yet, we never get tired.With each experience we gain, we get bits and pieces of ideas of how we tail assembly define love. But still, de acrimony all efforts given by our ancestors, and us, people in the present, we only see a blur, of loves real form. Maybe its about conviction we stop trying to define love, and however let it be. Let love be love. Maybe, we should start experiencing it, and enjoying it, instead of stressing ourselves trying to find meaning to something this mysterious, this big, this amazing. Yes, maybe we should do that. But theres something about trying to define love, that gives us this sense of satisfaction, because that more we try to find meaning for it, the more we get to experience it. Our hearts break off with so muc h happiness when we know that we are in the presence of love.Mr. Celestino, got into a deeper explanation of tons more raise topics, equal, the myths created by society, about love, about Aristophanes narrative that concerns human relationship, and a lot more, constituent of this a lot more topics include on of my favorite arguments ever. go to sleep at rootage sight. I have never been a believer of love at first sight. This may sound nauseous to those who believe, but, I think the idea is slightly unrealistic. Yes, its a really good idea. I mean, wouldnt it be practiced to see some integrity and automatically know that that person is the one? Isnt that what fades in most romantic movies? Two people scarce happens to be in the akin place,, at the identical time, and look at each other at the same moment. They look into each others eyes, and poof Theyre in love. It would be nice. I really would. But as I said earlier, thats what happens in most movies. Thats what happens in most romantic books or novels, even.These are made to tickle our systems and trick us into believe that these things could actually happen in to us real heart. Truthfully speaking, nothing that abruptly constructed, and well-made could happen in real life. We exist in reality. We dont live in some 2-hour-or-so film that is so beautifully made, it may be close to perfection. Thats not how life works. Thats not reality is all about. On the contrary, in reality, nothing happens the way we imagine it would, let alone like what would happen in films or books. Thats exactly why people make films and movies. They make things that they imagine come to life. They make their imaginations seem real, by empowerting them into films or books. This is where people get the concept of love at first sight. And upon reading through the article, I just found more proof to what I believe in. Mr Celestino said that there is no such thing as love at first sight. In verbatim, he said hunch does no t bite on a first sight.He explained that The presence of the other that is brought to ones sight appears as an assembly of physical qualities and in turn, the one beholding such sight finds himself or herself being caught in a whole tone that is simply stated as attraction. This bid sums up my thoughts, and puts them into words. As I most commonly say it, Love takes time. Baka calf love lang yan. He further explained that the attraction brought about or formed by run into or seeing someone particularly attractive, may breathe two things. crush and affection.He said that infatuation is a shadow of loves true form. He said that infatuation is limit as mere liking of visible qualities that are usually pleasing aesthetically to ones sight for a short-lived time. heart, on the other hand is love in its potential state. Affection is something that may sustain to be love. Love is neither infatuation, nor is it affection. Although affection may grow to be love, it is not love. A t least, not yet. These two are commonly ridiculous to be love. But as I always say, love takes time. It doesnt happen in a blink of an eye.He explained other topics, like the famous clichs, Love is blind, First love never dies, what love is in the Philippines, and another one of my favorite topics, rejection. According to the article, Rejection is hurtful but it is liberating in the sense that the self that is being refused is set free to reclaim himself/herself in order to heal the wounded nous and to love again when the right time comes. Yes, love is liberating, it may take some time to make all the pain go away, because nothing hurts more than the refusal of one to receive the self that is being offered. It traps the instinct of the sports fan into a world of agony and pain, and sometimes, the lover finds no other meaning in life, since he and his love had been rejected. This is why rejection is crucial in a lovers life. Simply because the pain inflicted to that person, ma y cost him his very life.The author also explained what pain is, and what its all about, selfishness, and disjoin and separation, how Gods love for humanity, and saviours crucifixion is the concretion of love in an ultimate sense. And he finish this beautiful article with a just conclusion, he said, To love, therefore, is to face even what is uncalled for and to unequivocal unselfish goodwill towards the other. It could be untellable in the bring but love will find a way to surpass it. That is why there is resurrection in every instance of death. I was left with no words, as I reached the break page of the article. It was beautiful, breathtaking, and heart stopping. It spoke from a view that is totally different from others. And it may still not contain answers to my question, but it made me hunger for more, thirst for answers, and hunger for the experience of love in its fullest.For me, to earn a symbiotic and inviolate relationship, there are a lot of values needed. Love, as there core, with others such as trust, understanding, disciple, esteem, etc. In spite of all these, I think a symbiotic relationships would not exist without respect. Because, well, love and respect would not be right without one another. If you love someone, you are going to respect him/her. And the everything else will follow. Respect comes with trust, and understanding. If you respect a person, you will trust him, that he/shes doing things for the better. You would come to a deeper understanding because you respect each other, and each others opinions. You will be discipline, because you respect your loved one, and if you respect them, you wont do anything that would bring them harm. All, in all, I think respect is an essential in a mutual loving relationship. afterward reading the article, honestly, I was left with no words. I was too breathless, too astonished, too bewildered to even speak. I had to process my thoughts, and get the thoughts of the author in synced with my own. I had to clear my head and catch my breath. Im not saying that the article gave me too much to handle. All Im trying to say is that the article is something different from all others that I have read. And now that its been a era since I last read the article, I outhouse finally confide with my thoughts and put them into words. afterwards reading this article, I have learned so much, and I can easily say that I have more knowledge about love than I could ever imagine. I never thought Id see myself writing this essay about love, (which isnt really my specialty), yet here I am, close to my fourth page.I never knew I had so much to say about love until now. I never knew the impact and effect that article had on me. And all my thoughts, put into a statement after reading Loves Pain is Its Own Redemption is found in the very first reprobate of this entire essay. It seems to me like I just went back to where I started, and let me state (or ask) it again. What is love? I learned t hat no matter how hard we try to define love, its just too big of a paradox to start with. Its too broad of an idea to put in just a few words in the dictionary. Its too extraordinary to try and figure out. Its to magical, to be given any scientific explanation. So I want to end my essay the way I started it. After reading the article written by Joseph Rey Celestino, M.A., Im left with only one question (and a gazillion more underneath it). What is love?