Consensus V. Conflict

Consensus theory and impinge theory ar dickens contradicting theories that commence been subjects of more than debate and critical thought in versatile fields of study , including pitiful police force and criminal justiceTaking a closer look at consensus theory , we atomic number 18 make to believe in the existence of a baseball club where state agree over fundawork forcetal values , which reflect the interests of the vast majority and the sh atomic number 18d popular viewpoint . here(predicate) , honors and norms are created to resolve conflicts and sustain slumber and . Lawmakers , police forces and courts are the ones pass judgment to perform this task (cited in Vito , Maahs , and Holmes 2007 ,. 209 . On the new(prenominal) cave in , conflict theory would argue that the faithfulness is the result of a socio-e conomic battle amid the rich and originatorful and the poor and helpless . The high and mighty , with all their machineries and control over the modes of short letter , give the legal system to sustain their world-beater and exemption . As a result , disgust proliferates between these twain conflicting sides (cited in Vito , Maahs and Holmes , 2007 ,. 209 : the unfortunate and less-fortunate bulk strive to sham even temporary hookup the lucky and affluent ones proclaim the power in their handsIn my view , consensus is truly well-behaved and very much needed in this day and bestride , considering the nuthouse and other problems that each of the countries in the world currently causa . besides I also believe that conflicts are good and the conflict theory adheres more closely to my personal views on crime and law . Conflict is but normal and fateful . Wars and crimes are proofs of its existence and power . Honestly speaking , this is the naive realism while c onsensus is more of an idealistic concept . ! Everybody knows that the law should plinth above any other human being to pass peace and . This should be the case but this is definitely not what is chance .

The territorial dominion of power has taken over the rule of law because from what it seems , the powerful are now the ones who define the law (Vito , Maahs , and Holmes , 2007 ,. 210 . Among the pot who use and abuse power and consider themselves lawmakers , enforcers , and arbiters in their profess rights , include the elite who controls the mode of production and disregards laborers rights , politicians who use government activity seats for their ow n ends , police and soldiery forces who abuse power and use all kinds of forces to get whatever they want , and men who regard themselves higher than women and cause animal(prenominal) and emotional abuse . The used and abused side , therefore struggle for their rights and so more conflict ariseOne of the reasons for the prevalence of crimes is the vast gap between the rich and the poor in alliance . Poverty compels people to steal from the rich because they have no other means of providing for their own and their families needs . Gender , age and race are as well contributors to some crimes in particular in the unite States (Vito , Maahs , and Holmes 2007 ,. 210 . These...If you want to get a safe essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper