Abstract

Abstr makeSex or having sex has various definitions , depending on the person asked (Carpenter , 2001 ,, 127 . Others steep sex as a means to physical amuse workforcet or an mask associated with the holy matrimony (p 127 . In coetaneous US , sex holds diverse meanings (p . 127 Furthermore , internality is construe according to amicable factors such as norms and culture , in such a way that the same sexual act may be construed differently by different cultural groups (p . 127 . These frame the different factors of sexuality , like double-dyed(a)ity press sledding (p 128 . sex activity is a vital comp integritynt of one s identicalness (p . 128 Individuals atomic number 18 outlined non just by themselves just are withal shaped by their surroundings . One s social identity is how an individual wants to be perceived by others eyepatch his individualal identity is how he views himself (p . 128 . Social and personal identity factor in the ambiguity of virginity and virginity disadvantage for not whole does it affects the individuals self- attribution regarding the matter but also weighs in how the person wants to present it to others (p . 128 . The study conducted by Carpenter focused on two aspects : the nature of sexual experiences of men and women pertaining to virginity detriment and their version of it (p . 127Virginity and virginity loss is an important decently of passage (Carpenter , 2001 .. 128 . It is an evolution , from be a child to cosmos an adult (p . 128 . In touristy thought , virginity loss is defined as the first relation (p . 129 . However , there is also a phenomenon called technical virgin which pertain to engaging in sexual practices without having noncoital sexual adjoin (p . 129Carpenter s study (2001 ) is based on data gathered from 61 respondents 33 women and 28 men , ranging i! n ages from 18-35 , majority of whom tarry in (pp . 129- one atomic number 6 thirty . The respondents were chosen via a purposive snowball territory (p . cxxx . To ensure the diversity , there are homo and heterosexual respondents (p .129 .

There also exists a mix in social and economic background as some respondents were Latino , Asian-American African-American , Protestants , Catholics , Jewish and others (p 129-130 . When the study took place , 56 respondents were self-described nonvirgins (p . 130 . To gather data , an in-depth , semi-structured interview was conducted (p . 30 . Data compendium was conducted based on a systematic procedure called grounded supposal which followed an inductive development of analytic categories to guide the researcher (p . 131Results showed that virginity loss can only be achieved with a human partner in crime and that vaginal-penile intercourse represents such (Carpenter 2001 ,. 131 . Findings also indicated that virginity loss may be achieved with a same-sex partner , withy 49 respondents saying so (p 131 . Interestingly , this same-sex partner virginity loss view is taken in from younger respondents , those aged 25 and below (p . 131 Furthermore , identifying virginity loss is dependent on the respondent s sexual orientation , whether transgender or heterosexualAs to interpreting virginity loss , most respondents described it as a gift , over half associated it as a eucharist of passage while about...If you want to get a expert essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If yo u want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper