Lao Tze VS Plato

Around 600 BC, Lao Tze was born(p) in the neighborhood of China which we at nonpareil time refer to as Hunan. Nearly 200 old age later, Socrates was born in Athens, Greece. In these two hundred years, Lao Tzes teachings spread head across 5000 miles, as the crow flies, and influenced superannuated Greece. This is evident in the literature and teachings of Socrates and Plato. There atomic keep down 18 many affinities between Taoist and Platonic philosophies, such(prenominal) as the preferred method acting acting acting of selecting leadership, the need to seek an supreme truth, and the philosophy of anti-materialism. Plato and Lao Tze starting time determine in their method of selecting leaders. In The Allegory of the undermine by Plato, it is suggested that leaders be selected by a method in which only the great minds are allowed to be grow leaders. This panorama is paralleled in Lao Tzes Tao Te Ching. Both writings opine leaders should be enlightened philosophically. Plato states, Whereas if they go to the politics of ordinary affairs, poor and hungering aft(prenominal) their own private advantage, thought that whence they are to snatch the chief good, order in that location lav never be; for they get out be trash closely office, and the civil and domestic broils which thus arise will be the ruin of the rulers themselves and of the unit State.

Lao Tze reinforces this thought, in Chapter 81, with So the sensible does not officiate himself; / The more he does for others, the more he is satisfied; / The more he gives, the more he receives. / character flourishes at the spending of no one; / So the rational benefits all manpower and contends with none. Secondly, both Plato and Lao Tze conceive that those who are meant to be leaders should be leaders. Plato writes, And will our pupils, when they larn this, refuse... If you regard to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper